🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, protest has ceased to be a fundamental right. Rather, it has become a privilege that those in power allow or withhold as they see fit. This represents the implication of proposed measures that the current government is putting forward, which would determine when and where protests can take place, with potential imprisonment for those who defy these limitations.

Erosion of Democratic Rights

Previous administrations had already undermined this essential right: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement sweeping additional powers, which international human rights organizations had censured as "significant and unjustified limitations" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these progressive assaults on liberty have practically abolished the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Using Tragedy to Justify Crackdown

The latest limitations are being justified by referring to last week's heinous antisemitic attack on a Manchester mosque. We can all agree on universal agreement that the security of Jewish communities in Britain must be safeguarded. However, employing this horrific incident as a justification to suppress dissent is not only unrelated to that responsibility but perverts it.

"When you cannot set boundaries at mass killing, you likely cannot draw the line at democracy," observed a well-known American author, a statement that rings true for the present administration.

Historical Context of Demonstration

Consider Britain's long tradition of public demonstration and direct action against racism and fascism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s mobilizations against the far-right organization. Many of these historical demonstrators were labeled as extremists in their era, even while they were advocating the freedoms of minorities.

Current Reality

In the current complex situation, here's what's truly happening: Israel – a foreign state – is committing what United Nations investigations have described as genocide. Its military actions have led the global justice body to issue legal indictments against Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister.

International popular sentiment has shifted dramatically against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a large percentage of citizens think Israel has likely committed war crimes. Most people would support a complete ban on arms sales to the state, and back the arrest of the Israeli leader.

Silencing Dissent

Having essentially failed the argument, Israel's supporters are now seizing on a vile anti-Jewish attack to try to silence a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems included in this effort. Government officials have failed to implement extensive restrictions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to proceed.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a more extensive crackdown on these demonstrators until now: extremely few protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement minimal reason to intervene.

Dangerous Conflation

Merging Jewish identity with the policies of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also harmful. The standard interpretation of anti-Jewish prejudice, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately questioned for potentially restricting legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its key examples: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've reached a point where police authorities can propose that demonstrations opposing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "inadvertently or intentionally" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, government officials have declared that recognition of Palestine as a nation has made political parties "implicated" in alleged abuse faced by Jewish communities.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the same day as the synagogue attack, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from 24 months of ongoing violence that have taken many thousands of human lives. British political leaders and news organizations have barely concealed the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian life. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of racism in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a concerning threshold by banning Palestine Action, a non-violent, human rights-focused direct action organization. Thousands of British protesters have been detained, primarily for holding placards opposing genocide and supporting the banned organization. Many of those detained are pensioners; including a former clergyman and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize demonstrations supporting Palestine: a former House Speaker suggested that some were "connected to" foreign governments, while the sitting leader described such demonstrations as anti-Jewish. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the authoritarian crackdown on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted sweeping powers to control opposition. What might a new administration do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors fought, endured hardship and died to establish our freedoms. We may ultimately regret how casually we permitted them to be eroded.